THE IRAQI DEAD OF 2003-4 – AIRBRUSHED OUT OF THE US/UK POLITICAL EQUATION

 

John Sloboda, Co-founder Iraq Body Count (john@iraqbodycount.org)

 

Western ignorance and indifference to Iraq deaths

At least 10,000 civilians have met violent deaths since the Bush/Blair invasion of Iraq. Yet this horrific milestone has hardly registered in the US/UK media. Iraq Body Count was founded in January 2003 because a small group of American and British volunteers knew, from previous history (in Serbia, in Afghanistan) that no official count of innocent dead would ever be made. Even those US and European politicians who opposed the war, supposedly on humanitarian grounds, are now silent about civilian casualties. The excuses offered from Washington, London, and even now Baghdad, for failing to undertake the proper recording and accounting for the casualties of violence – are ludicrous and self-contradictory. Tony Blair made the following statement in the House of Commons, on official record, on March 19th 2003 "Let me make it quite clear that our quarrel is not with the Iraqi people .... [Saddam Hussein] will be responsible for many, many more deaths even in one year than we will be in any conflict." If the UK government will not undertake a casualty count, then this statement is meaningless at best, plain false at worst.

 

What we know about civilian deaths

Iraq Body Count’s methodology relies on a minimum of two reputable media sources for a given incident in which non-combatant civilians are reported killed. These corroborated incidents are entered into to an on-line database which adjusts for any variations and uncertainty in reporting by including a minimum and maximum number of deaths for each incident. We include all reported non-combatant victims of post-invasion violence in our database, whether they were killed by occupation or anti-occupation forces. We reject attempts to blame others for some deaths. If the war was avoidable, all deaths following from it are the responsibility of those who chose to initiate war while other options remained open. The situation is even more clear-cut in the so-called “post-war phase”, when, under resolution 1483 of the Security Council on May 18th 2003, the USA and UK were given joint and unified status of “Occupying Authority.” In doing so, the UN bound the USA and UK under the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the Hague Regulations of 1907 to protect the life, health, and property of civilians. The failure to adhere to these rules places every violent death at the door of the Occupying Authority. There was practically no street violence in the last years of Saddam’s rule. In contrast deaths by violence (mainly gunshots) in Baghdad alone climbed towards 900 per month in Summer 2003.

 

In the war-phase itself, up to May 1st, as many as 7,350 civilian deaths were recorded by IBC, split in as yet undetermined proportions between deaths due to “high-tech” aerial bombardment by US and UK warplanes and those resulting from the decidedly “low-tech” ground war. Immediately after the war, unexploded munitions and cluster bombs became another major cause of death. Since May 1st, we have firm reports of another 3,000 deaths, some at the hands of coalition forces, but more caught in the crossfire between insurgents and coalition forces. The worrying trend of recent months is the deliberate targeting of civilians by suicide bombers.

 

Impact and implications

Every Iraqi civilian who dies on the streets of Baghdad brings new recruits to Al-Qaeda, and increases the threat to us all. It is not only human compassion which motivates the call for a proper accounting as well as an end to the killing. It is also self- interest. Three practical things need to be done.

 

First, we need to “fill in the gaps” in our knowledge about casualties. We need strong and solid links with agencies and organisations in Iraq who are undertaking research, and we need go-betweens and translators.

 

Second, we need high-profile champions for the work of counting the dead, here in the UK. A few brave parliamentarians have stuck their necks above the parapet. We’d particularly like to thank Llew Smith, Adam Price, Bob Marshall-Andrews, Clare Short, Alice Mahon, and a very few others, for placing questions about civilian casualties on the parliamentary record and in the public eye. A few newspapers have also carried reports and op-ed pieces. We owe a particular debt of gratitude to David Randall and colleagues on the Independent on Sunday. We also thank the editors of the Guardian Comment page. But much more needs doing. Maximum public support is needed for our call for an independent tribunal on civilian deaths.

 

Third, in the total absence of government or statutory charitable funding for the work, money is needed to carry on. The entire Iraq Body Count project has so far been funded out of the pockets of its volunteers and donations from the general public. Properly funded, we could do more.

 

March 13th 2004

 

COMPENSATE THE 10,000 IRAQI WAR VICTIMS NOW!

 

“More than 10,000 civilians, many of them women and children, have been killed so far in the Iraqi conflict, making the continuing conflict the most deadly war for non-combatants waged by the West since the Vietnam war more than 30 years ago. The passing of this startling milestone has been recorded by Iraq Body Count, the most authoritative organisation monitoring the human cost of the war. Since the invasion began in March, this group of leading academics and campaigners has registered all civilian deaths in Iraq attributable to the conflict. They do this in the absence of any counts by the US, British, or Baghdad authorities.”

David Randall writing in the Independent on Sunday, February 8th 2004.

 

“Yes, Americans and British citizens were lied to by the politicians. Yes, they are owed answers. But the people of Iraq are owed a great deal more, and that enormous debt belongs at the very centre of any civilised debate about the war”.

From “Feel guilt: then move on” Naomi Klein. Guardian, Friday February 20th 2003.

 

“If the war was fought on false pretences, then every death caused by the war is a death on false pretences. And if that’s the case, the most urgent question is not who knew what when, but who owes what to whom?” John Sloboda, co-founder of Iraq Body Count, interviewed by Naomi Klein in the Guardian, Friday February 20th 2003.

 

“Iraq Body Count has demanded an independent international tribunal to examine the war’s death toll and potential compensation, a call which has now been supported by the former cabinet minister Clare Short”.

David Randall writing in the Independent on Sunday, February 15th 2003.

 

THE TASK OF RECORDING AND HONOURING THE INNOCENT DEAD CANNOT BE LEFT TO ANY ONE NATION. ONLY THE AUTHORITY OF A TRANSNATIONAL ORGANISATION SUCH AS THE UNITED NATIONS WILL GIVE THE TASK THE NECESSARY IMPARTIALITY AND AUTHORITY.

 

Support the call for a tribunal. Write to your MP. Donate to Iraq Body Count.

 

IRAQ BODY COUNT

www.iraqbodycount.net